China’s rise has often been depicted as an unstoppable economic juggernaut. Yet much of that narrative relies on a carefully managed appearance—propaganda, selective statistics, and policy-driven growth that paper over structural decay. Behind the façade, demographic collapse, EV industry failure, and a real estate bubble reveal a far less resilient economy.
1. One‑Child Policy: Boosting Productivity by Limiting Dependents
The one‑child policy (1979–2015) dramatically reduced fertility and dependency ratios, allowing more women to work. A respected macroeconomic study shows this policy promoted human capital investment and raised per capita output versus a no‑policy scenario (Journal of Development Economics, vol. 101, 2013). The authors concluded that limiting family size improved savings, education spending, and productivity.
(Reference: “The one‑child policy: A macroeconomic analysis,” ScienceDirect) ScienceDirect
Likewise, a 2025 University of Michigan study found that as childcare demands dropped and time freed up, female entrepreneurship increased by nearly 40%, boosting household income and overall productivity. (Journalistic summary: Michigan Ross, March 4 2025) Michigan Ross
These gains, however, came with long-term demographic costs. China now faces population decline amid ultra-low fertility, leading to an aging workforce that undermines future productivity.
2. Appearance vs Reality: Government Incentives Maintain the Illusion
Much of China’s growth narrative stems from centrally directed policy: massive subsidies, infrastructure projects, favorable bank loans, and regional licensing. Local governments compete to host industries by underwriting startups, bidding for land deals, and inflating growth metrics. This mirrors how government agencies can “massage” unemployment or GDP figures for reassurance rather than reality.
In infrastructure, built roads, bridges, and airports often yield limited economic return. A major academic study (Ansar et al., 2016) concluded that China’s infrastructure investments frequently produce negative risk‑adjusted returns and contribute to financial fragility rather than durable growth. arXiv
3. EV Boom Turned Bust: The Subsidy-Fueled Shakeout
Between 2018 and 2025, over 400 Chinese EV startups failed. Of roughly 500 brands at peak, fewer than 100 remain. Analysts forecast fewer than 50 surviving by 2030. Government subsidies initially fueled explosive entry but then evaporated; price wars followed, eliminating underfunded firms. EVBoosters
Notable failures include WM Motor (bankrupt in 2023 despite billions raised), Byton (liquidated in 2021 before scaling production), Singulato (filed for bankruptcy in 2023 with ¥17 billion in funding), and Qiantu Motor (went under in early 2025). Yicai Global
Consultancy AlixPartners predicts only 15 of the current 129 Chinese EV brands will survive to 2030. These few will control 75% of the market; most others will have vanished. Reuters
Even publicly listed companies such as Nio, Xpeng, and Zeekr report substantial losses—despite record sales. BYD is one of the rare profitable firms. Business Insider
4. Real Estate: A Systemic Bubble Beyond 2008
China’s property sector was long celebrated as the driver of middle-class wealth and GDP growth. But real estate, construction, and related finance once accounted for nearly 30% of GDP. When Evergrande collapsed—with over $300 billion in liabilities—dozens of other developers followed suit. Homes sold to speculators remain unfinished across the country. Wikipédia
Local governments relied heavily on land resale for revenue. These built enormous — often unneeded — infrastructure, eroding productivity while inflating debt. ⠀
(Reference: Ansar et al. on infrastructure inefficiency) arXiv
5. COVID: A Facade Breaks
China’s strict, centralized COVID lockdowns disrupted growth longer than in the West, yet government data continued to project resilience. Meanwhile, population decline accelerated: births in 2023 fell to 9 million—the lowest in decades. The fertility rate remains below 1.1, threatening long-term workforce viability. By some estimates, over 30% of the population will be age 65+ by 2050. WIRED wsj.com
6. False Success: The Danger of Surface-Level Growth
Like figures cooked by financial regulators to show stability, many Chinese economic figures obscure deeper rot: ghost cities, insolvent developers, industrial overcapacity, and stagnant domestic consumption. The central government emphasizes headline GDP numbers, but under the surface sits debt, demographic decline, and shrinking demand.
Conclusion
China’s growth has been maintained on a façade: income appears robust, startups abound, infrastructure glistens—but cracks are widening. The one‑child policy once lifted productivity by enabling female labor and reducing dependents—but it also triggered long-term demographic collapse. Massive subsidies and centralized direction created EV bubbles, unsustainable infrastructure, and inflated real estate wealth—all now imploding.
Rather than assuming China’s dominance is inevitable, it’s time to look beneath the surface. Its growth narrative is increasingly a tale of appearances—arcane control masked by data. In contrast, the West’s relative transparency, innovation culture, and systemic adaptability may be better poised for long-term resilience.
FR 
EN